digital goodness

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Tue May 04, 2004 1:38 am

just playing abit with my canon...all toned down for internet viewing.

MissTeja · Post by **MissTeja** » Tue May 04, 2004 5:58 am

Very nice, sin.

I especially like the last one, capturing the movement in a sort of surreal moment, though the first one catches my eye quite a bit as well. Keep it up, man.

FlakJacket · Post by **FlakJacket** » Tue May 04, 2004 6:28 am

My list of liking goes 2, 4, 3 then 1. But light bud? Good christ man, why?

MissTeja · Post by **MissTeja** » Tue May 04, 2004 6:38 am

Because it's the King of Beers, yo! Just the healthier version.

FlakJacket · Post by **FlakJacket** » Tue May 04, 2004 6:51 am

King of Beers? Bring on the regicide says I! And you might as well drinks yaks piss if you want healthy. Well, it'd be organic at least- and probably taste better.

MissTeja · Post by **MissTeja** » Tue May 04, 2004 6:56 am

Bah! Silly Birminghmanian. Trix are for kids.

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Tue May 04, 2004 7:21 am

It was the only beer sitting still long enough to shoot...

Szechuan · Post by **Szechuan** » Tue May 04, 2004 2:21 pm

Angel · Post by **Angel** » Sun Jul 25, 2004 7:29 pm

Sin, which lens do you have for your Canon?

I like the moonshot the most, for me it show really shows the distance, the solitude, nice pic!

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:28 am

I have the standard and a 75-300mm. I just picked up a 2xteleconverter to play with also.

Salvation122 · Post by **Salvation122** » Wed Jul 28, 2004 5:17 am

I don't know why, but the first picture just screams to me of a Lightwave render and good texture work instead of a natural picture. Looks too clean, I guess.

Szechuan · Post by **Szechuan** » Wed Jul 28, 2004 12:56 pm

I think it's because the flash makes the can appear brighter than the background to the point that it looks like it's been inserted artificially.

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:18 pm

Szech there is no flash used in that pic. That is reflection from the campfire your seeing on the can.

Szechuan · Post by **Szechuan** » Wed Jul 28, 2004 2:21 pm

Ah. My bad. Either way, my point still stands.

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:13 pm

that is the difference between a digital camera set at 1600ISO vs a 35mm using 1600iso film. You loose the grainy feel of the film.

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Fri Aug 06, 2004 3:02 am

(Photoshoped 4 pics together)

WARNING SPIDER BELOW