Homosexuality

DV8 · Post by **DV8** » Sun May 15, 2005 8:08 am

There's no real discussion that I want to start, but, statistically, we should have some homosexuals among us, but I don't remember anyone ever claiming to be a homosexual. So, is anyone here a homosexual?

Moulsari · Post by **Moulsari** » Sun May 15, 2005 8:13 am

DV8 wrote:There's no real discussion that I want to start, but, statistically, we should have some homosexuals among us, but I don't remember anyone ever claiming to be a homosexual. So, is anyone here a homosexual?

This is an incredibly important subject to Dennis, so please respond, everyone. You have no idea how important it is.

Crazy Elf · Post by **Crazy Elf** » Sun May 15, 2005 11:49 am

I believe that Mr Mooky is, but I'm not sure that he's figured out that Bulldrek is up and running again. Should I bump into him again, which I have done on a few occasions, I'll let him know.

It should also be noted that Ross is gay.

Ancient History · Post by **Ancient History** » Sun May 15, 2005 7:17 pm

Strictly for the record, I would like to say I am not gay. Just, y'know, if there was ever any doubt or anything.

Serious Paul · Post by **Serious Paul** » Sun May 15, 2005 7:25 pm

Why is it so important?

Moulsari · Post by **Moulsari** » Sun May 15, 2005 7:31 pm

I wish I knew why. But I don't know why it's so important. All I know is it's important, more important than many other things you'd think were important.

Salvation122 · Post by **Salvation122** » Sun May 15, 2005 7:34 pm

Mooky's gay, if I remember correctly, and Lexi was a pre-op transsexual. (Might be the wrong handle, but there was definetly a MtF pre-op here a while ago.) Angel, if I remember correctly, is either homosexual or a bisexual with a very strong preference for women; I think BroJ mentioned experimenting with dudes a few times.

Plus there's Elf. Fucking Ross, that Idaho kid is.

While given the size of the community I would tend to agree that it's statisticaly likely there's a homosexual in our ranks, what numbers are you using?

Serious Paul · Post by **Serious Paul** » Sun May 15, 2005 9:08 pm

Moulsari wrote:I wish I knew why. But I don't know why it's so important. All I know is it's important, more important than many other things you'd think were important.

Vague, but I guess as I have an immense respect for him I'll answer. I am quite straight as men hold no interest to me sexually.

I think Sal's list was kind of on the mark, although I don't know if we should be allowed to answer for others.

Szechuan · Post by **Szechuan** » Sun May 15, 2005 9:20 pm

Straighterino, in spite of all signs pointing otherwise.

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Sun May 15, 2005 11:38 pm

are you asking stictly homosexual or is bi acceptable as well? And I am honestly suprised no one else threw in my name in the "admittedly Bi" catagory...

Serious Paul · Post by **Serious Paul** » Sun May 15, 2005 11:48 pm

I'd forgotten you were alive! Heh motorcycle fiend!

Jeff Hauze · Post by **Jeff Hauze** » Mon May 16, 2005 1:43 am

I'd fall under the admittedly bi category I guess. Or bi-experimental at least. Or if Crazy Elf were speaking, partially Ross.

Whatever. Take your pick.

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Mon May 16, 2005 1:47 am

Jeff Hauze wrote: Whatever. Take your pick.

Don't you mean "take your Prick"

JetPlane · Post by **JetPlane** » Mon May 16, 2005 2:41 am

I dated only women for a year and a half, but I'm obviously only involved with a man now.

And also, a pre-op trans does not neccessarily mean that Lexi was a homosexual.

3278 · Post by **3278** » Mon May 16, 2005 3:04 am

It'll surprise no one to learn that I'm straight. Men don't deserve the level of lovin' I'm capable of generating.

Kitt · Post by **Kitt** » Mon May 16, 2005 3:09 am

I am bisexual with a stronger preference to males. There have been two females that I really REALLY wanted to date, but that things didn't work out with because of parents or one leaving to go off to college.

Johnny the Bull · Post by **Johnny the Bull** » Mon May 16, 2005 5:11 am

Straight. Us men are ugly, ugly people.

Sowhat · Post by **Sowhat** » Mon May 16, 2005 7:21 am

Same as Kitt I'd say.

Elf, isn't mooky on your msn list? I'll e-mail him anyway.

Van Der Litreb · Post by **Van Der Litreb** » Mon May 16, 2005 10:06 am

Johnny the Bull wrote:Straight. Us men are ugly, ugly people.

Hah! I'll second that.

Bishop · Post by **Bishop** » Mon May 16, 2005 12:41 pm

I'm straight. My brother's gay.

JohnnyRico · Post by **JohnnyRico** » Mon May 16, 2005 12:46 pm

Van Der Litreb wrote:
Johnny the Bull wrote:Straight. Us men are ugly, ugly people.
Hah! I'll second that.

We have a motion by Johnny the Bull, seconded by Veed.
All In Favor?
[soundbyte="Most of the World saying Aye"]
Against?
[soundbyte="Boybands and male models prancing around and lisping Nay"]

The Ayes have it.
The motion passes.

And for the record, I quote SNL's Celebrity Jeopardy:
"And you wagered.... I Heart Boobs."

DarkMage · Post by **DarkMage** » Mon May 16, 2005 12:53 pm

I've always been a bit curiouse about expermenting with guys, but I've never found one that I found myself attracted to enough to really do anything...so I may be bi, I will say I LOVE the pussy.

Angel · Post by **Angel** » Mon May 16, 2005 2:30 pm

I'm a card carrying member of the "Girls for girls" club, at one time I thought I could be bi, but that idea faded away a while ago.

3278 wrote:Men don't deserve the level of lovin' I'm capable of generating.

I hear'ya brother!

AtemHutlrt · Post by **AtemHutlrt** » Tue May 17, 2005 4:10 pm

3278 wrote:Men don't deserve the level of lovin' I'm capable of generating.

Why must you constantly rub it in our faces? *sob*

Marius · Post by **Marius** » Tue May 17, 2005 4:50 pm

AtemHutlrt wrote:
3278 wrote:Men don't deserve the level of lovin' I'm capable of generating.
Why must you constantly rub it in our faces? *sob*

I kind of wish that didn't evoke any images of 32 rubbing your face with high-level love.

Van Der Litreb · Post by **Van Der Litreb** » Tue May 17, 2005 6:23 pm

Personally, I like it. Not that I'm gay or anything.

Kitt · Post by **Kitt** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:21 am

This is my personal opinion, so don't anybody crucify me if they don't agree.
I believe that everyone is at least a little bi-curious for at least a little while. People are naturally drawn to things that are "forbidden", "taboo", or just plain not always agreed with. Sort of a Pandora's Box/Promethius/Frankenstein thing. And everyone I've met lately has been admittedly bisexual, whether with a stronger draw from their own sex or from the other. And haven't some studies proven that at some point in their life, almost everyone questions their sexuality?

Szechuan · Post by **Szechuan** » Wed May 18, 2005 4:40 am

Kitt wrote:I am bisexual with a stronger preference to males. There have been two females that I really REALLY wanted to date, but that things didn't work out with because of parents or one leaving to go off to college.

In other words, you're 17.

Patience · Post by **Patience** » Wed May 18, 2005 6:27 am

Szechuan wrote:
Kitt wrote:I am bisexual with a stronger preference to males. There have been two females that I really REALLY wanted to date, but that things didn't work out with because of parents or one leaving to go off to college.
In other words, you're 17.

:

Kitt · Post by **Kitt** » Wed May 18, 2005 11:04 am

Szechuan wrote:In other words, you're 17.

18, thanks.

Sticks · Post by **Sticks** » Wed May 18, 2005 11:21 am

Hot damn, she's legal!

Szechuan · Post by **Szechuan** » Wed May 18, 2005 1:44 pm

Kitt wrote:
Szechuan wrote:In other words, you're 17.
18, thanks.

Same difference.

JongWK · Post by **JongWK** » Wed May 18, 2005 3:15 pm

Straight.

Daki · Post by **Daki** » Wed May 18, 2005 7:33 pm

Straight. I'm afraid I would scare men away.

3278 · Post by **3278** » Wed May 18, 2005 7:52 pm

Kitt wrote:I believe that everyone is at least a little bi-curious for at least a little while.

"To one degree or another," or so I'm told. I've never really /felt/ curious, but that just means my "degree" isn't very high. *shrug* I never really liked boys, anyway, so sex with them seems uninteresting.

Kitt wrote:People are naturally drawn to things that are "forbidden", "taboo", or just plain not always agreed with. Sort of a Pandora's Box/Promethius/Frankenstein thing. And everyone I've met lately has been admittedly bisexual, whether with a stronger draw from their own sex or from the other.

And I think the first sentence is a fair portion of the reason for the last. While I'm certain there are compelling physiological and psychological reasons for bi-curiousness, I think the vast majority of people who are curious or think they're curious are actually what I call "bi-cool," not "bi-curious." People are interested in the forbidden, but people are also interested in being cool, and what's more cool than what's most forbidden?

Personally, I'm sick and tired of "bi-cool" people, and wish that fad would die down. If they're actually curious, great, whatever. But when they're just doing it for attention, I find it greatly irritating.

Kitt wrote:And haven't some studies proven that at some point in their life, almost everyone questions their sexuality?

Hell, I did, and I'm the most non-gay person I know. My questioning period was very brief - about 10 seconds, since I just did it in my head - since I derived a - uniquely male - method of ascertaining my preference. This works for nearly any male, so give it a try, men:

Look at an attractive naked man. Do you have an erection?
Look at an attractive naked woman. Do you have an erection?

Poof.

Adam · Post by **Adam** » Wed May 18, 2005 10:31 pm

Look at an attractive naked man. Do you have an erection?
Look at an attractive naked woman. Do you have an erection?

Poof.

Are you callin' us gay?

Serious Paul · Post by **Serious Paul** » Wed May 18, 2005 11:39 pm

So Dennis are you going to answer why this is so important? I'll be honest I am curious, plus you've not said nary a word since this has gone up, and I know you've been online. So was this just churning or something worth hearing about?

sinsual · Post by **sinsual** » Thu May 19, 2005 2:33 am

Daki wrote:Straight. I'm afraid I would scare men away.

I disagree but that is another thread.

DV8 · Post by **DV8** » Thu May 19, 2005 7:43 am

Serious Paul wrote:So Dennis are you going to answer why this is so important?

It really isn't important at all. I think that was Moulsari having a bit of fun with me, trying to make it seem like I am as gay as The Gay Model would be.

...plus you've not said nary a word since this has gone up, and I know you've been online. So was this just churning or something worth hearing about?

I have had very little time, even though I've been online. The reason I asked is that I was curious that with all the sex threads out there, I had heard very little about homosexuals on Bulldrek. That's either because there aren't any - and it seems there's really but two or three - or because people just hadn't made it known, which seems to be the case as well. I didn't know about Mooky or Angel.

Crazy Elf · Post by **Crazy Elf** » Sat May 21, 2005 12:57 am

I think people just don't peg it, Deev. I know a lot of gays really don't like to be categorised by their sexuality, and dislike the idea that they have to come forward and say upon introduction, "Hi, I'm such and such, and I'm a Ross." It's not really fair when you think about it. I don't introduce myself and say, "I'm straight by the way."

It's odd, a lot of people assume that if someone's gay they'll know about it. Typically you do, because a lot of people end up defining themselves by their sexuality to a degree, but still a lot of homosexuals are pretty balanced and at home with where they like to put their wing wangs or whom they like to lick their bean.

Jeff Hauze · Post by **Jeff Hauze** » Sat May 21, 2005 2:23 am

Crazy Elf wrote:but still a lot of homosexuals are pretty balanced and at home with where they like to put their wing wangs or whom they like to lick their bean.

While still absolutely true, one of the funnier ways I've heard of same sex activities described. This is, of course, why I love the Elf in completely inappropriate sexual manner.

zemookie · Post by **zemookie** » Sat May 21, 2005 4:08 am

<voice class:Rainer Wolfcastle> "Maybe you all are homosexuals" </voice class:Rainer Wolfcastle>

mrmooky · Post by **mrmooky** » Sat May 21, 2005 12:47 pm

Crazy Elf wrote:I believe that Mr Mooky is, but I'm not sure that he's figured out that Bulldrek is up and running again.

For the record, I am both here and queer. Haven't had much time to post here the last few weeks, though.

Sowhat · Post by **Sowhat** » Sun May 22, 2005 5:54 am

3278 wrote:While I'm certain there are compelling physiological and psychological reasons for bi-curiousness, I think the vast majority of people who are curious or think they're curious are actually what I call "bi-cool," not "bi-curious." People are interested in the forbidden, but people are also interested in being cool, and what's more cool than what's most forbidden?

I'm not sure about guys, but I think that most girls really are bi-curious as opposed to bi-cool. There was a thread here a couple of years ago about research on the subject, and the results suggested that females were aroused by both male and female stimuli, whereas men were only aroused by female stimuli (I think it was about watching porn, I can't remember the article exactly).

My theory is that men are designed* to be straight (and being bi or gay is a slip-up) because they're supposed to spread their seed around and our ancestors (apes) had a system where the alpha male would impregnate all the females in a group. The females would be mostly straight (they still need to get pregnant), but because their partner is sleeping around, it makes sense for them to be fond of his other fuck buddies aswell, but perhaps to a lesser degree. And most women will have a problem with their partner sleeping with another woman, but I think less would mind having a threesome with an extra girl. Basically I think it's a residual effect of how we evolved to have one man breeding with many females. Any opinions on this?

*When I say designed, I don't mean we were designed by an intelligent being, and I don't mean what's morally right, but rather how we have evolved to function.

Salvation122 · Post by **Salvation122** » Sun May 22, 2005 6:49 am

Crazy Elf wrote:I know a lot of gays really don't like to be categorised by their sexuality, and dislike the idea that they have to come forward and say upon introduction, "Hi, I'm such and such, and I'm a Ross." It's not really fair when you think about it. I don't introduce myself and say, "I'm straight by the way."

As an aside, I don't have any problem with homosexuals, but I straight-up despise people who define themselves through their sexuality, whichever way they blow. I'm far more comfortable and accepting of people who don't introduce themselves as gay (or flaunt it in other blatantly obvious ways) - people who think of themselves as people that happen to like dudes or chicks rather than "a guy who likes dudes."

Brineshrimp · Post by **Brineshrimp** » Tue May 24, 2005 1:28 am

...at home with where they like to put their wing wangs or whom they like to lick their bean.

Wow, Elf. That was simply put, perfect. I nearly pissed myself. Thankfully, I had an erection and was able to fight the urine-urge away with a brief thought of Elf tea-bagging Jeff.

Okay, now I need to go lie down.

mrmooky · Post by **mrmooky** » Thu May 26, 2005 1:48 pm

Salvation122 wrote:I'm far more comfortable and accepting of people who don't introduce themselves as gay (or flaunt it in other blatantly obvious ways) - people who think of themselves as people that happen to like dudes or chicks rather than "a guy who likes dudes."

I think of myself as a guy who likes dudes - because it's true. And I don't know where you've managed to find people who don't think of themselves as people.

Salvation122 · Post by **Salvation122** » Thu May 26, 2005 7:46 pm

Yeah, that bit was kinda unclear, but I think the first half of my post does a decent job of explaining what I meant.

Angel · Post by **Angel** » Fri May 27, 2005 6:38 pm

How many people here have had some sort of sexual encounter with a person of the same sex but still consider themselves to be neither gay/lesbian or bi?

DV8 · Post by **DV8** » Fri May 27, 2005 9:55 pm

Adam and I kissed once.

Homosexuality

Homosexuality

Re: Homosexuality