Prozac linked to cancer? Bulldrek in immediate danger!
- Adam
- Freeman of the Crimson Assfro
- Posts: 2393
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 4:27 am
- Location: on.ca
- Contact:
Prozac linked to cancer? Bulldrek in immediate danger!
Thought this was kind of interesting - http://news.independent.co.uk/world/sci ... ory=278505
I'm too sleepy to say much about it, but I thought that some other people may have some stuff to say about this.
I'm too sleepy to say much about it, but I thought that some other people may have some stuff to say about this.
- Silent Sniper
- Bondsman of the Crimson Assfro
- Posts: 2189
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 7:48 pm
- Location: Bulldrek
It's in the air
I have to try and dig up a humor piece done about 2 years ago where the author managed to link everything to cancer in some way, even things as simple as walking and breathing.
- FlameBlade
- SMITE!™ Master
- Posts: 8644
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 3:54 am
- Contact:
Did you hear? Turning on lamps is linked to cancer! Drinking Cola Cola will help you digest that burger. Playing the Sims is linked to ellipsey. Playing with stuffed animals is also linked to cancer.
Geeeeeeeeeee!
Basically, I just "fuck it" and enjoy my life.
Geeeeeeeeeee!
Basically, I just "fuck it" and enjoy my life.
_I'm a nightmare of every man's fantasy.
- DrunkenMaster
- Bulldrekker
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 6:43 am
- Location: Pineland
No, actually your body's pretty good at killing off cancer cells, which is why it's usually not cancer.Well, isn't your body pretty terrible at killing off cancer cells in the first place? I mean, that's why it's cancer.
There is then a need to guard against a temptation to overstate the economic evils of our own age, and to ignore the existence of similar, or worse, evils in earlier ages. Even though some exaggeration may, for the time, stimulate others, as well as ourselves, to a more intense resolve that the present evils should no longer exist, but it is not less wrong and generally it is much more foolish to palter with truth for good than for a selfish cause. The pessimistic descriptions of our own age, combined with the romantic exaggeration of the happiness of past ages must tend to setting aside the methods of progress, the work of which, if slow, is yet solid, and lead to the hasty adoption of others of greater promise, but which resemble the potent medicines of a charlatan, and while quickly effecting a little good sow the seeds of widespread and lasting decay. This impatient insincerity is an evil only less great than the moral torpor which can endure, that we with our modern resources and knowledge should look contentedly at the continued destruction of all that is worth having. There is an evil and an extreme impatience as well as an extreme patience with social ills.
- Thorn
- Wuffle Student
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 11:10 pm
- Location: The Cave, Cheeseland, USA
Well, I'd guess the main reason cancer has seemed to become so prevalent in the past century or so is because suddenly people are living long enough not to get killed off by other things first. I mean, when people regularly died of pneumonia, they weren't around long enough to develop lung cancer all that often.
_<font color=red size=2>Just wait until I finish knitting this row.</font>
- Jestyr
- Footman of the Imperium
- Posts: 3036
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2002 8:10 am
- Location: BNE/.au
- Contact:
One of Australia's most effective breast-cancer awareness campaigns featured a painting by (I think) Rembrandt, featuring a semi-nude woman (it may have been Bathsheba at her Bath but I really can't remember.
The gist of the campaign was along the lines of 'this was a beautiful woman, but see the <various marks> Rembrandt represented so faithfully? They couldn't have known that this is one of the first visible signs of breast cancer. Go get checked' etc. Basically, without realising it, Rembrandt had accurately painted the tumourous breast of his model (his lover?). Cancer's been around a long time.
The gist of the campaign was along the lines of 'this was a beautiful woman, but see the <various marks> Rembrandt represented so faithfully? They couldn't have known that this is one of the first visible signs of breast cancer. Go get checked' etc. Basically, without realising it, Rembrandt had accurately painted the tumourous breast of his model (his lover?). Cancer's been around a long time.
__
Jeff Hauze: Wow. I think Jestyr just fucking kicked my ass.
Jeff Hauze: Wow. I think Jestyr just fucking kicked my ass.
I don´t really understand why, but I find that very disturbing. Looking at that picture made my skin crawl. I suppose that reaction is why the campaign was so effective.
One time I built a matter transporter, but things got screwed up (long story, lol) and I ended up turning into a kind of half-human, half-housefly monstrosity.